Ontario Mineral Inventory

Ontario Geological Survey
Permanent Link to this Record: MDI42D15SE00019

Record: MDI42D15SE00019

General

Mineral Record Identification
Record Name(s) Renshaw-Tripp Occurrence - 1949, Middleton Fe-Ti Occurrence - 1949, Little Pic Iron - 9999
Related Record Type Partial
Related Record(s)
Record Status Occurrence
Date Created 1980-Jan-04
Date Last Modified 2022-Nov-22
Created By
Revised By

Commodities

Primary Commodities: Titanium, Iron

Secondary Commodities: Magnetite



Location

Township or Area: Walsh

Latitude: 48° 47' 52.11"    Longitude: -86° 39' 4.72"

UTM Zone: 16    Easting: 525607   Northing: 5405038    UTM Datum: NAD83

Resident Geologist District: Thunder Bay South

NTS Grid: 42D15SE

Point Location Description: Trench

Location Method: Field Visit with GPS

Access Description: The showings occur in the southeast part of Walsh Township just north and south of Highway 17, northeast of Middleton station on the CPR Mainline (claim map G-636, Walsh Township). The occurrence is located on the north side of Highway 17, 1 km west of the Little Pic River.



Exploration History

1949: Showings discovered; prospectors B. Renshaw, E. Tripp and F. Gardner. 1950: Trenching and sampling; prospectors B. Renshaw, E. Tripp and F. Gardner. 1951: Geological survey; T. Page. 1954: Moneta Porcupine Mines Ltd. conducted geological and geophysical surveys and diamond drilling. 1975: D. Fairbairn staked the property and contracted an airborne geophysical survey. 1979: Placer Development Ltd. conducted geological mapping. 1983: Property examination and lithogeochemical sampling; OGS Resident Geologist staff. 1987: Property examination and lithogeochemical sampling; OGS Resident Geologist staff. 1992: Property examination and lithogeochemical sampling; OGS Resident Geologist staff. 1994: Sampling; C. Weibel. 2015: Staked by B.D. Gionet.


Assessment Work on File

Assessment Work on File
Office File Number Online Assessment File Identifier Online Assessment File Directory
2.2282 42D16SW0078 42D16SW0078
2.38721 20000003135 20000003135
13 42D15NE0067 42D15NE0067
2.3224 42D15NE0050 42D15NE0050
2.38768 20000003142 20000003142

Geology

Province: Superior

Subprovince: Wawa

Terrane: Wawa-Abitibi

Belt: Schreiber-Hemlo

Geological Age: Archean  



Geology Comments

Dec 07, 2005 (D McKay) - Page (1951, assessment files) describes the local geology: Magnetite is a constituent mineral of the younger hornblende and in some places may be observed in the form of patches and ill defined vein forms near the contact with the earlier brown augite syenite. The most important mineralization has, however, taken place along fault fractures within the augite syenite. Two sets of fault fractures are apparent, one, a flat dipping (15 to 20 degrees) and the other more steeply inclined (40 to 70 degrees) dipping either to the east or west. A close association structurally was noted between the red pegmatite dikes and the steeply dipping magnetite veins. Whether or not these dikes may form a marker for the location of iron bearing veins is not known at present but their possible significance should be born in mind. Five occurrences of titaniferous magnetite veins were noted.




Lithology

Lithology Data
Rock Type Rank Composition Texture Relationship
Syenite 1 Augite Syenite Host

Mineralization

Mineralization and Alteration
Rank Mineral Name Class Economic Mineral Type Alteration Mineral Type Alteration Ranking Alteration Intensity Alteration Style
1IlmeniteEconomicOre
2MagnetiteEconomicOre
3PyriteEconomicOre
7ChalcopyriteEconomicOre
8PyrrhotiteEconomicOre
4OlivineEconomicGangue
5ApatiteEconomicGangue
6BiotiteEconomicGangue

Mineralization Comments

Dec 07, 2005 (D McKay) - Walker (1967) notes: Segregation of pure ilmenite-magnetite are common in augite syenite as aggregated to disseminated grains. Shklanka (1968, p.412) reports: High grade zones up to 20 feet (6 m) in width yielded 7 assays which range from 33.19 to 45.17% Fe and 4.5 to 13.55% TI02. Walker (1967) suggests that the tonnage potential seems relatively small. In his report, Anderson (1951, assessment files) cites: It is apparent that the magnetic mineral in this ore contains high percentage of titanium, and as such would be unsuitable as an iron ore. The ratio of concentration is too high to be profitable. From 100 tons (90.7 tonnes) of ore milled, only 9 tons (8.16 tonnes) of concentrate would be recovered. A grab sample collected from the Renshaw-Tripp Fe-Ti zone by C. Weibel and submitted to the SH Resident Geologist (OGS) for analysis returned assay results of >5% TiO2, 52 ppm Cu, 14 ppm Ni, 65 ppm V, 651 ppm Zn, <3 ppb Au, <5ppb Pd and <10 ppb Pt.


Sep 16, 2015 (Therese Pettigrew) - Sulphide mineralization is confined to a rock type significantly different from the gabbro norm containing appreciably more olivine, apatite/ biotite and ilmenomagnetite. The presence of orthopyroxene is also suspect. The sulphides/ chalcopyrite and pyrrhotite are typically disseminated occurring interstitially to the silicates. Oxides of copper were occassionally observed. Visual estimates of copper rarely exceed 0.25 percent. Segregations of ilmenomagnetite which appear to be conformable in attitude occur within gabbros in the eastern part of the claim block. These segregations range in width from less than 1 meter to several tens of meters and have been traced for up to 100 meters along strike, Generally the ilmenomagnetite content is less than 25 percent but locally may reach 75 percent. A grab sample taken for assay returned the following results: Sample 55516: 400 ppb Au, 0.11% Cr, 0.08% Cu, 30 ppb Pd, 200 ppb Pt, 5.39% Ti, and 0.46% P (AFRO 2.3224). A bulk sample collected returned the following whole rock results: 43.56% Fe, 0.118% P, 0.42% Mn, 13.75% Si, 2.39% Al, 0.838% S, 8.97% Mg, 13.55% Ti (OFR5951).



Mineral Record Details

Characteristics
Rank Characteristic            
1 Intrusive

Site Visit Information

Date: Sep 04, 2015

Geologist: Therese Pettigrew

Notes: Visited the site with M. Smyk, M. Puumala, D. Campbell, R. Cundari and M. Brunelle. Noted the strong magnetism of the outrcrop.



References

MonoMap - Geology of the Jackfish-Middleton area, District of Thunder Bay

Publication Number: R050 Page: 36  Date: 1997

Author: Walker J.W.R.

Publisher Name: Ontario Dept. of Mines

Location:


Map - Nipigon-Schreiber, geological compilation series, Thunder Bay District

Publication Number: M2232 Scale: 1:253,440    Date: 1973

Author: Carter M.W., McIlwaine W.H., Wisbey P.A.

Publisher Name: Ontario Division of Mines

Location:


Mono - Iron deposits of Ontario

Publication Number: MDC011 Page: 412  Date: 1968

Author: Shklanka R.

Publisher Name: Ontario Dept. of Mines

Location:


Map - Jackfish-Middleton area, Thunder Bay District

Publication Number: M2107 Date: 1967

Author: Walker J.W.R.

Publisher Name: Ontario Dept. of Mines

Location:


Mono - Mineral Occurrences in the Nipigon-Marathon Area, Volumes 1 and 2.

Publication Number: OFR5951 Page: 591-593  Date: 1996

Author: Schnieders B.R., Smyk M.C., Speed A.A., McKay D.B.

Publisher Name: Ontario Geological Survey

Location:


File - Schreiber-Hemlo Resident Geologist Mineral Deposit Files

Publication Number: Min Dep Date:

Author:

Publisher Name:

Location: Thunder Bay RGP


Mono - Industrial Mineral Occurrences and Deposits in Northwest Ontario

Publication Number: OFR5889 Page: 114-117  Date: 1994

Author: Hinz P., Landry R.M.

Publisher Name: Ontario Geological Survey

Location:


Report an Error

We are continuously updating our assessment file / technical report information. If you notice errors in the data, please contact us.


Terms of Use

Please review our Terms of Use agreement for this data product.


Ministry Contact Information

For detailed information regarding this mineral record please contact the Thunder Bay South Resident Geologist District Office