GeologyOntario has moved. You will be redirected to the new site in 10 seconds. If you are not immediately redirected please follow the below link to the new GeologyOntario platform. For assistance please contact us.
Ontario Geological Survey
Permanent Link to this Record:
MDI52L01SE00005
Record Name(s) | Red Deer Lake Deposit - 9999 |
---|---|
Related Record Type | Simple |
Related Record(s) | |
Record Status | Producing Mine |
Date Created | 1996-Dec-12 |
Date Last Modified | 2023-Feb-02 |
Created By | |
Revised By |
Primary Commodities: Granite
Township or Area: Wonderland Lake Area
Latitude: 50° 2' 23.18" Longitude: -94° 10' 20.29"
UTM Zone: 15 Easting: 416054.83 Northing: 5543711 UTM Datum: NAD83
Resident Geologist District: Kenora
NTS Grid: 52L01SE
Point Location Description: The quarry is located approx 40 km NE of Kenora and 12.6 km E of the Forgotten Lake quarry.
Location Method: Field Visit with GPS
Access Description: LOCATED ON THE WST SHORELINE OF RED DEER L. ,40 KM NE OF KENORA,15 KM NW OF JONES.THE AREA CAN BE ACCESSED BY TRAVELLING NORTH FROM KENORA ON HIGHWAYS 604 AND 671 AND THE LOUNT LAKE ROAD FOR APPROX. 60 KM.
Prior to 1987 no exploration for dimension stone had been conducted. 1987: Claims stake by C.B. Nelson for Nelson Granite. B.R. Crowley staked 6 claims and transferred them to T. Coppola of Canital Granite. 1988: Canital Granite removed some test blocks from the site. Nelson Granite conducted power stripping and mechanical work including removal of some test blocks. C. Wrazej staked a single claim west of Red Deer Lake. Transferred claim to A.T. Palin. 1989 to 1991: Nelson Granite continued to work on their property. T. Coppola transferred all interest to Manex Granit Inc. Manex continued working on the property. A.T. Palin conducted geophysical and geological surveys. A.T. Palin transferred claim to Palin Granite Canada Inc. No further work conducted, claim cancelled. 1994: Nelson Granite and Canital Granite continue to hold claims north and west of Red Deer Lake. From 1996 to 2000 Nelson Granite produced 4851 cubic metres of stone quoted from Kenora ROAs. 2022: Nelson Granite holds an aggregate permit on the quarry.
Province: Superior
Subprovince: Winnipeg River
Terrane: Winnipeg River
Geological Age: Archean Geochronological Age: 2.66 GA Geochron. Age Ref.: BEAKHOUSE (1991)
Dec 07, 2005 (Peter Hinz) - The property is underlain by rocks of the Lount Lake batholith, part of the Winnipeg River supbrovince (WRS). Beakhouse (1991) provides the following descriptions, (quote) The WRS is a dominantly granitoid domain within the central part of the western Superior Province. Granodioritic to granitic plutons, the granitic suite, and minor dioritic to granodioritic plutons, the mafic suite, were emplaced between 2.66 and 2.71 Ga. The granitic suite is interpreted to have originated by the partial melting of the older metatonalites in tectonically thickened crust. The various phases of the Lount Lake batholith are typical of the granitic suite. (unquote).
Dec 07, 2005 (W Bellinger) - Beakhouse (1991) describes the geology of the area: The Winnipeg River Subprovince is a dominantly granitoid domain within the central part of the western Superior Province. The Subprovince is flanked to the south by a granite-greenstone domain (western Wabigoon Subprovince) and to the north by a metasedimentary migmatite domain (English River Subprovince) and a greenstone domain (Bird River Subprovince). Granodioritic to granitic plutons, the granitic suite, and minor dioritic to granodioritic plutons, the mafic suite, were emplaced between 2.66 and 2.71 Ga. The granitic suite is interpreted to have originated by the partial melting of the older metatonalites in tectonically thickened crust. Beakhouse (1991) goes on to describe the Lount Lake Batholith: The various phases of the Lount Lake batholith are typical of the granitic suite. The most abundant rock type is medium-grained granodiorite commonly characterized by large (less than 10 cm in diameter; usually approximately 1 to 3 cm in their longest dimension), subhedral to euhedral, perthitic microcline megacrysts. On the basis of their textures, composition and phase equilibria considerations, these megacrysts have been interpreted to be late magmatic megacrysts rather than true phenocrysts or porphyroblasts (Beakhouse 1983). Biotite is the ubiquitous and dominant mafic phase. Subordinate hornblende occurs very locally in close proximity to amphibolitic enclaves and is interpreted to be xenocrystic. Common primary accessory phases include magnetite, epidote, sphene, zircon and apatite. Secondary alteration products include white mica, epidote and carbonate (after plagioclase), and chlorite and magnetite (after biotite).
Rock Type | Rank | Composition | Texture | Relationship | Syenitoid-Unsubdivided | 1 | Porphyritic,Coarse-Gr. | Host |
---|
Dec 07, 2005 (Peter Hinz) - The most abundant rock type is medium-grained granodiorite commonly characterized by large (less than 10 cm in diameter; usually approximately 1 to 3 cm in their longest dimension), subhedral to euhedral, perthitic microcline megacrysts. On the basis of their textures, composition and phase equilibria considerations, these megacrysts have been interpreted to be late magmatic megacrysts rather than true phenocrysts or porphyroblasts (Beakhouse 1983). Biotite is the ubiquitous and dominant mafic phase. Subordinate hornblende occurs very locally in close proximity to amphibolitic enclaves and is interpreted to be xenocrystic. Common primary accessory phases include magnetite, epidote, sphene, zircon and apatite.
Dec 07, 2005 (W Bellinger) - The stone is composed of pink potassium feldspar phenocrysts in a fine- to medium-grained matrix of potassium and plagioclase feldspars, quartz and biotite. JOINTING: Kennedy and Sherlock (1988) described the jointing: The granite formation is very massive with few, widely spaced, vertical fractures. Sheeting or horizontal fracturing is spaced from 1 to 5 m and greater allowing for extraction of very large blocks. COLOUR: The stone is reddish-brown in colour TEXTURE: The stone displays a coarse-grained and porphyritic texture. The stone is marketed as “Red Deer Brown” or “Canadian Mahogany”.
Dec 07, 2005 (W Bellinger) - The stone is composed of pink potassium feldspar phenocrysts in a fine- to medium-grained matrix of potassium and plagioclase feldspars, quartz and biotite. JOINTING: Kennedy and Sherlock (1988) described the jointing: The granite formation is very massive with few, widely spaced, vertical fractures. Sheeting or horizontal fracturing is spaced from 1 to 5 m and greater allowing for extraction of very large blocks. COLOUR: The stone is reddish-brown in colour TEXTURE: The stone displays a coarse-grained and porphyritic texture.
Feb 19, 2013 (Shannon Zurevinski) - Products are termed: Red Deer Brown and Canadian Mahogany. In 2010- 2079m3 was extracted. In 2011- 1652m3 was extracted.
Dec 07, 2005 (Peter Hinz) - Secondary alteration products include white mica, epidote and carbonate (after plagioclase), and chlorite and magnetite (after biotite).
Dec 07, 2005 (W Bellinger) - 9) CHEMICAL ANALYSIS: Sample No. 87MCK-0002: 69.09 SiO2, 15.21 Al2O3, 3.27 Fe2O3, 0.04 MnO, 0.59 MgO, 2.00 CaO, 3.10 Na2O, 5.97 K2O, 0.58 TiO2, 0.26 P2O5. Sample No. 87MCK-0002D: 69.17 SiO2, 15.16 Al2O3, 3.20 Fe2O3, 0.04 MnO, 0.57 MgO, 1.98 CaO, 3.21 Na2O, 5.96 K2O, 0.55 TiO2, 0.25 P2O5. Analyses by Geoscience Laboratories, Ontario Geological Survey, Toronto.
Commodity | Analytical Method | Digestion Method | Result | Unit | Limit | Qualifier |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aluminum | Unknown | 15.14 | % | Al2O3 | ||
Calcium | Unknown | 1.39 | % | CaO | ||
Iron | Unknown | 3.61 | % | Fe2O3 | ||
Magnesium | Unknown | .81 | % | MgO | ||
Manganese | Unknown | .05 | % | MnO | ||
Phosphate | Unknown | .23 | % | P2O5 | ||
Potassium | Unknown | 6.51 | % | K2O | ||
Silica | Unknown | 68.53 | % | SiO2 | ||
Sodium | Unknown | 3.04 | % | Na2O | ||
Titanium | Unknown | .65 | % | TiO2 |
Zone | Year | Category | Tonnes | Reference | Comments | Commodities |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Red Deer | 2013 | Indicated Mineral Resource | 100000 | OFR 6291 |
Year | Tonnes | Commodities | Reference | Comment |
---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2944 | A total of 2011.7 m3 (71 041 ft3) were produced for use as monument and building stone (C. Spence, Nelson Granite Ltd., personal communication, 2013). |
Map - Kenora-Fort Frances, geological compilation series, Kenora and Rainy River districts
Publication Number: M2443 Scale: 1:253,440 Date: 1981
Author: Blackburn C.E., Beard R.C., Rivett A.S.
Publisher Name: Ontario Geological Survey
Location:
Mono - Dimensional Stone Occurrences and Deposits in Northwest Ontario
Publication Number: OFR5890 Date: 1994
Author: Hinz P., Landry R.M., Gerow M.C.
Publisher Name: Ontario Geological Survey
Location:
Map - Geological series, Operation Kenora-Sydney Lake, Gordon-Big Canyon lakes, District of Kenora
Publication Number: P1031 Scale: 1:63,360 Date: 1975
Author: Breaks F.W., Bond W.D., McWilliams G.H., Gower C.F., Findlay D.C.
Publisher Name: Ontario Division of Mines
Location:
MonoMap - Preliminary geological synthesis of the English River Subprovince, northwestern Ontario and its bearing upon mineral exploration
Publication Number: MP072 Date: 1978
Author: Breaks F.W., Bond W.D., Stone D.
Publisher Name: Ontario Geological Survey
Location:
File - Industrial minerals geologist files
Publication Number: IMF Date: 1996
Author:
Publisher Name:
Location: Thunder Bay RGP
Article - Northwestern Region Industrial Minerals Program - 1987
Publication Number: MP138.007 Date: 1997
Author: Kennedy M.C., Sherlock E.J.
Publisher Name: Ontario Geological Survey
Location:
File - Kenora Resident Geologist Mineral Deposit Files
Publication Number: RGF Date: 1996
Author:
Publisher Name:
Location: Kenora RGP
Mono - Building and ornamental stone inventory in the districts of Kenora and Rainy River
Publication Number: MDC027 Date: 1986
Author: Storey C.C.
Publisher Name: Ontario Geological Survey
Location:
We are continuously updating our assessment file / technical report information. If you notice errors in the data, please contact us.
Please review our Terms of Use agreement for this data product.
For detailed information regarding this mineral record please contact the Kenora Resident Geologist District Office